Current practices of craniospinal irradiation techniques in Turkey: a comprehensive dosimetric analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates various craniospinal irradiation (CSI) techniques used in Turkish centers to understand their advantages, disadvantages and overall effectiveness, with a focus on enhancing dose distribution. METHODS: Anonymized CT scans of adult and pediatric patients, alongside target volumes and organ-at-risk (OAR) structures, were shared with 25 local radiotherapy centers. They were tasked to develop optimal treatment plans delivering 36 Gy in 20 fractions with 95% PTV coverage, while minimizing OAR exposure. The same CT data was sent to a US proton therapy center for comparison. Various planning systems and treatment techniques (3D conformal RT, IMRT, VMAT, tomotherapy) were utilized. Elekta Proknow software was used to analyze parameters, assess dose distributions, mean doses, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) for both target volumes and OARs. Comparisons were made against proton therapy. RESULTS: All techniques consistently achieved excellent PTV coverage (V95 > 98%) for both adult and pediatric patients. Tomotherapy closely approached ideal Dmean doses for all PTVs, while 3D-CRT had higher Dmean for PTV_brain. Tomotherapy excelled in CI and HI for PTVs. IMRT resulted in lower pediatric heart, kidney, parotid, and eye doses, while 3D-CRT achieved the lowest adult lung doses. Tomotherapy approached proton therapy doses for adult kidneys and thyroid, while IMRT excelled for adult heart, kidney, parotid, esophagus, and eyes. CONCLUSION: Modern radiotherapy techniques offer improved target coverage and OAR protection. However, 3D techniques are continued to be used for CSI. Notably, proton therapy stands out as the most efficient approach, closely followed by Tomotherapy in terms of achieving superior target coverage and OAR protection.

Phantosmia during proton radiation and differences in frequency of phantosmia rates based on proton craniospinal irradiation technique for pediatric brain tumor patients.

BACKGROUND: Unusual olfactory perception, often referred to as "phantosmia" or "cacosmia" has been reported during brain radiotherapy (RT), but is infrequent and does not typically interfere with the ability to deliver treatment. We seek to determine the rate of phantosmia for patients treated with proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and identify any potential clinical or treatment-related associations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 127 pediatric patients treated with CSI, followed by a boost to the brain for primary brain tumors in a single institution between 2016 and 2021. Proton CSI was delivered with passive scattering (PS) proton technique (n = 53) or pencil beam scanning technique (PBS) (n = 74). Within the PBS group, treatment delivery to the CSI utilized a single posterior (PA) field (n = 24) or two posterior oblique fields (n = 50). We collected data on phantom smell, nausea/vomiting, and the use of medical intervention. RESULTS: Our cohort included 80 males and 47 females. The median age of patients was 10 years (range: 3-21). Seventy-one patients (56%) received concurrent chemotherapy. During RT, 104 patients (82%) developed worsening nausea, while 63 patients (50%) reported episodes of emesis. Of those patients who were awake during CSI (n = 59), 17 (29%) reported phantosmia. In the non-sedated group, we found a higher rate of phantosmia in patients treated with PBS (n = 16, 42%) than PS (n = 1, 4.7%) (p = .002). Seventy-eight patients (61%) required medical intervention after developing nausea/vomiting or phantosmia during RT. Two patients required sedation due to the malodorous smell during CSI. We did not find any significant difference in nausea/vomiting based on treatment technique. CONCLUSION: Proton technique significantly influenced olfactory perception with greater rates of phantosmia with PBS compared to PS. Prospective studies should be performed to determine the cause of these findings and determine techniques to minimize phantosmia during radiation therapy.

Proton pencil beam scanning craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with a single posterior brain beam: Dosimetry and efficiency.

This study explores the feasibility and potential dosimetric and time efficiency benefit of proton Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) craniospinal irradiation with a single posterior-anterior (SPA) brain field. The SPA approach was compared to our current clinical protocol using Bilateral Posterior Oblique brain fields (BPO). Ten consecutive patients were simulated in the head-first supine position on a long BOS frame and scanned using 3 mm CT slice thickness. A customized thermoplastic mask immobilized the patient's head, neck, and shoulders. A vac-lock was used to secure the legs. PBS proton plans were robustly optimized with 3mm setup errors and 3.5% range uncertainties in the Eclipse V15.6 treatment planning system (n = 12 scenarios). In order to achieve a smooth gradient dose match at the junction area, at least 5 cm overlap region was maintained between the segments and 5 mm uncertainty along the cranial-cauda direction was applied to each segment independently as additional robust optimization scenarios. The brain doses were planned by SPA or BPO fields. All spine segments were planned with a single PA field. Dosimetric differences between the BPO and SPA approaches were compared, and the treatment efficiency was analyzed according to timestamps of beam delivery. Results: The maximum brain dose increases to 111.1 ± 2.1% for SPA vs. 109.0 ± 1.7% for BPO (p < 0.01). The dose homogeneity index (D5/D95) in brain CTV was comparable between techniques (1.037 ± 0.010 for SPA and 1.033 ± 0.008 for BPO). Lens received lower maximum doses by 2.88 ± 1.58 Gy (RBE) (left) and 2.23 ± 1.37 Gy (RBE) (right) in the SPA plans (p < 0.01). No significant cochlea dose change was observed. SPA reduced the treatment time by more than 4 minutes on average and ranged from 2 to 10 minutes, depending on the beam waiting and allocation time. SPA is dosimetrically comparable to BPO, with reduced lens doses at the cost of slightly higher dose inhomogeneity and hot spots. Implementation of SPA is feasible and can help to improve the treatment efficiency of PBS CSI treatment.

Comparison of passive-scattered and intensity-modulated proton beam therapy of craniospinal irradiation with proton beams for pediatric and young adult patients with brain tumors.

PURPOSE: To investigate the dose stability of craniospinal irradiation based on irradiation method of proton beam therapy (PBT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-four pediatric and young adult brain tumor patients (age: 1-24 years) were examined. Treatment method was passive-scattered PBT (PSPT) in 8 patients and intensity-modulated PBT (IMPT) in 16 patients. The whole vertebral body (WVB) technique was used in 13 patients whose ages were younger than 10, and vertebral body sparing (VBS) technique was used for the remaining 11 patients aged 10 and above. Dose stability of planning target volume (PTV) against set-up error was investigated. RESULTS: The minimum dose (Dmin) of IMPT was higher than that of PSPT (p = 0.01). Inhomogeneity index (INH) of IMPT was lower than that of PSPT (p = 0.004). When the irradiation field of the cervical spinal cord level (C level) was shifted, the maximum dose (Dmax) was lower in IMPT, and mean dose (Dmean) was higher than PSPT as movement became greater to the cranial-caudal direction (p = 0.000-0.043). Dmin was higher and INH was lower in IMPT in all directions (p = 0.000-0.034). When the irradiation field of the lumber spinal cord level (L level) was shifted, Dmax was lower in IMPT as movement became greater to the cranial direction (p = 0.000-0.028). Dmin was higher and INH was lower in IMPT in all directions (p = 0.000-0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The PTV doses of IMPT and PSPT are robust and stable in both anterior-posterior and lateral directions at both C level and L level, but IMPT is more robust and stable than PSPT for cranial-caudal movements. TRIAL REGISTRY: Clinical Trial Registration number: No. 04-03.

Molecular characterization of long-term survivors of metastatic medulloblastoma treated with reduced-dose craniospinal irradiation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Current standard treatment for metastatic medulloblastoma consists of 36 Gray (Gy) of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) supplemented with local irradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Although contemporary protocols have been designed to limit a radiation dose using risk-adapted CSI dosing to reduce neurocognitive morbidity, high-dose CSI remains the standard of care. Recently, the molecular classification of medulloblastoma has been emerging but its clinical significance has not been established particularly in patients with metastatic medulloblastoma treated with lower dose of CSI. METHODS: We molecularly analyzed three cases of metastatic medulloblastoma treated with 24.0 Gy of CSI by DNA methylation analysis using the Illumina EPIC array. RESULTS: All three patients had spinal metastases at the time of diagnosis. Postoperative treatment included multiple courses of chemotherapy, 24 Gy of CSI with focal boost to primary and metastatic sites, and high-dose chemotherapy. There was no disease progression observed during the 9.0, 7.7, and 5.7　years post-diagnosis follow-up. The molecular diagnosis was Group 3/4 in all three cases. Cases 1 and 2 belonged to Subtypes 7 and 4, both of which were reported to be good prognostic subtypes among the group. Case 3 belonged to Subtype 5 with MYC amplification. CONCLUSIONS: The present cases suggest that the novel subtype classification in Group 3/4 medulloblastoma may be useful for risk stratification of patients with metastatic medulloblastoma who received lower dose of CSI than standard treatment.

Late Effects of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Electron Spinal Fields for Pediatric Patients With Cancer.

PURPOSE: For children, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with photons is associated with significant toxic effects. The use of electrons for spinal fields is hypothesized to spare anterior structures but the long-term effects remain uncertain. We studied late effects of CSI using electrons for spinal radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Records of 84 consecutive patients treated with CSI using electrons for the spine at a single institution between 1983 and 2014 were reviewed. Median age at RT was 5 (range, 1-14) years. The most common histologies were medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (59%) and ependymoma (8%). The median prescribed dose to the entire spine was 30 Gy (range, 6-45). A subset of 48 (57%) patients aged 2 to 14 at RT with clinical follow-up for ≥5 years was analyzed for late effects. Height z scores adjusted for age before and after CSI were assessed using stature-for-age charts and compared with a t test. RESULTS: At median follow-up of 19 years (range, 0-38 years), the median survival was 22 years (95% confidence interval, 12-28 years) after RT, with 47 patients (56%) alive at last follow-up. On subset analysis for late effects, 19 (40%) patients developed hypothyroidism and 5 (10%) developed secondary malignancies. Other complications reported were esophageal stricture and periaortic hemorrhage in 1 and restrictive pulmonary disease in 1 patient. Median height z score before treatment was -0.4 (36th percentile; interquartile range, -1.0 to 0.0) and at last follow-up was -2.2 (first percentile; interquartile range, -3.1 to -1.6; P < .001). Of 44 patients with spinal curvature assessments, 15 (34%) had scoliosis with median Cobb angle 15° (range, 10°-35°) and 1 (2%) required surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent musculoskeletal toxic effects and predominantly decreased height were seen with long-term follow-up. Scoliosis and hypothyroidism were each seen in at least one-third of long-term survivors. However, clinically evident esophageal, pulmonary, and cardiac toxic effects were infrequent.

Effects of Proton Craniospinal Radiation on Vertebral Body Growth Retardation in Children.

PURPOSE: It is of great interest to physicians and patients/patients' families to be able to predict the amount of growth decrement after craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Little data exist on the effect of proton CSI. Our aim was to determine the effect of proton CSI on vertebral body (VB) growth retardation, and to identify factors associated with growth delay. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective outcome data analysis of 80 patients <16 years old with central nervous system tumors who received proton radiation therapy (PRT) at the Massachusetts General Hospital between 2002 and 2010 with available spinal magnetic resonance imaging. Forty-eight patients received CSI, and 32 patients with brain tumors who received focal cranial irradiation served as controls. VB height was measured midline using sagittal T1-weighted contrast or noncontrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Measurements were repeated at multiple levels (C3, C3-C4, T4, T4-T5, C3-T6, T4-T7, L3, L1-L5) on available scans for the duration of follow-up. Data were fitted using a mixed-effects multivariable regression model, including follow-up time, CSI dose, age at CSI, and pretreatment VB percentile as parameters. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 69.6 months for patients treated with proton CSI and 52.9 months for the control group. There was a significant association of CSI dose, follow-up time, age at treatment, and pretreatment VB percentile with VB growth retardation. Growth retardation was shown to be independent of gender or growth hormone deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Although the current practice of PRT CSI delivery allows for sparing of the organs anterior to the spine, the vertebral column receives radiation therapy because of its close proximity to the targeted spinal canal. In growing children, the whole VB has generally been included so that growth impairment is even across the VB. We present a quantitative model predicting the growth retardation of patients treated with PRT CSI based on age at treatment, CSI dose, follow-up time, and pretreatment growth percentile.

Encouraging early outcomes with image guided pencil beam proton therapy for cranio-spinal irradiation: first report from India.

BACKGROUND: To report our experience with image guided pencil beam proton beam therapy (PBT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2019 and December 2021, we carried out a detailed audit of the first forty patients treated with PBT. We had recorded acute toxicities, reporting early outcomes and discuss limitations of current contouring guidelines during CSI PBT planning. RESULTS: Median age of the patient cohort was 8 years, and histologies include 20 medulloblastoma, 7 recurrent ependymoma, 3 pineoblastoma, 3 were germ cell tumors and remaining 7 constituted other diagnoses. Forty percent patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Median CSI dose was 23.4 Gy (Gray; range 21.6-35 Gy). Thirty-five patients (87.5%) completed their CSI without interruption, 5 required hospital admission. No patient had grade 2/ > weight loss during the treatment. Forty-five percent (18) developed grade 1 haematological toxicities and 20% (8) developed grade 2 or 3 toxicities; none had grade 4 toxicities. At median follow up of 12 months, 90% patients are alive of whom 88.9% are having local control. Special consideration with modification in standard contouring used at our institute helped in limiting acute toxicities in paediatric CSI patients. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary experience with modern contemporary PBT using pencil beam technology and daily image guidance in a range of tumours suitable for CSI is encouraging. Patients tolerated the treatment well with acceptable acute toxicity and expected short-term survival outcome. In paediatric CSI patients, modification in standard contouring guidelines required to achieve better results with PBT.

Modified volumetric modulated arc therapy technique with reduced planning and treatment time for craniospinal irradiation utilising two isocentres.

INTRODUCTION: Paediatric patients (individuals below 18 years of age) requiring cranial-spinal irradiation (CSI) at our institution are commonly planned and treated using a three isocentre (3-ISO) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. A modified two isocentre (2-ISO) VMAT technique was investigated with the aim to improve workflow and reduce planning and treatment time. METHODS: Five CSI paediatric patients previously treated with a 3-ISO VMAT technique were retrospectively replanned using a 2-ISO VMAT technique. The 2-ISO VMAT plans were reviewed and approved by a radiation oncologist (RO) before undergoing patient-specific quality assurance (QA) procedures, performed by a radiation oncology medical physicist (ROMP). Planning target volume (PTV) coverage, organ-at-risk (OAR) dose as well as planning and treatment durations of the first five patients utilising 2-ISO technique were compared with 3-ISO technique. RESULTS: The average percentage difference in PTV coverage by 95% reference dose between the 2-ISO and 3-ISO is 0.14%, and the average difference in OAR median dose is 0.68 Gy. Conformity and homogeneity indices have the same averages at 1.18 and 0.4 respectively. Patient-specific physics QA results were all comparable with the 3-ISO averages at 98.84% and the 2-ISO at 98.71%. Planning duration for the 2-ISO was reduced by up to 75%, and daily treatment duration was reduced by up to 50%. Of all the previously treated CSI patients using a 3-ISO technique, 45% were suitable for the 2-ISO technique. CONCLUSION: The 2-ISO VMAT technique provided comparable dose distribution based on PTV coverage, OAR dose and plan metric indices. Reduced planning and treatment duration with the 2-ISO technique facilitated improved workflow with decreased sedation time for paediatric patients requiring a general anaesthesia.

Out-of-field doses in pediatric craniospinal irradiations with 3D-CRT, VMAT, and scanning proton radiotherapy: A phantom study.

PURPOSE: Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) has greatly increased survival rates for patients with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma and other primitive neuroectodermal tumors. However, as it includes exposure of a large volume of healthy tissue to unwanted doses, there is a strong concern about the complications of the treatment, especially for the children. To estimate the risk of second cancers and other unwanted effects, out-of-field dose assessment is necessary. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare out-of-field doses in pediatric CSI treatment using conventional and advanced photon radiotherapy (RT) and advanced proton therapy. To our knowledge, it is the first such comparison based on in-phantom measurements. Additionally, for out-of-field doses during photon RT in this and other studies, comparisons were made using analytical modeling. METHODS: In order to describe the out-of-field doses absorbed in a pediatric patient during actual clinical treatment, an anthropomorphic phantom, which mimics the 10-year-old child, was used. Photon 3D-conformal RT (3D-CRT) and two advanced, highly conformal techniques: photon volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and active pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton RT were used for CSI treatment. Radiophotoluminescent and poly-allyl-diglycol-carbonate nuclear track detectors were used for photon and neutron dosimetry in the phantom, respectively. Out-of-field doses from neutrons were expressed in terms of dose equivalent. A two-Gaussian model was implemented for out-of-field doses during photon RT. RESULTS: The mean VMAT photon doses per target dose to all organs in this study were under 50% of the target dose (i.e., <500 mGy/Gy), while the mean 3D-CRT photon dose to oesophagus, gall bladder, and thyroid, exceeded that value. However, for 3D-CRT, better sparing was achieved for eyes and lungs. The mean PBS photon doses for all organs were up to three orders of magnitude lower compared to VMAT and 3D-CRT and exceeded 10 mGy/Gy only for the oesophagus, intestine, and lungs. The mean neutron dose equivalent during PBS for eight organs of interest (thyroid, breasts, lungs, liver, stomach, gall bladder, bladder, prostate) ranged from 1.2 mSv/Gy for bladder to 23.1 mSv/Gy for breasts. Comparison of out-of-field doses in this and other phantom studies found in the literature showed that a simple and fast two-Gaussian model for out-of-field doses as a function of distance from the field edge can be applied in a CSI using photon RT techniques. CONCLUSIONS: PBS is the most promising technique for out-of-field dose reduction in comparison to photon techniques. Among photon techniques, VMAT is a preferred choice for most of out-of-field organs and especially for the thyroid, while doses for eyes, breasts, and lungs are lower for 3D-CRT. For organs outside the field edge, a simple analytical model can be helpful for clinicians involved in treatment planning using photon RT but also for retrospective data analysis for cancer risk estimates and epidemiology in general.

Clinical Implementation of Robust Multi-isocentric Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy for Craniospinal Irradiation.

AIMS: To determine if multi-isocentric volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for craniospinal irradiation (CSI-VMAT) can be implemented safely and accurately using robust optimisation in a commercially available treatment planning system. Our initial clinical experience is reported for the first 20 patients treated with the technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received between 23.4 and 39.6 Gy (mode 23.4 Gy) in 13-22 fractions with CSI-VMAT. The heart mean dose was 4.2-10.3 Gy (median 5.3 Gy) for patients prescribed up to 24 Gy and 6.5-16.3 Gy (median 10.1 Gy) for patients receiving 35 Gy or more. The lung mean dose was 5.5-7.6 Gy (median 6.8 Gy) for patients prescribed up to 24 Gy and 6.9-11.1 Gy (median 10.0 Gy) for patients receiving 35 Gy or more. The robustness of the planning target volume D0.1cm3 and D99% to systematic errors in the isocentre superoinferior position of up to 5 mm was evaluated. These remained acceptable but were correlated to the length of the available beam overlap through the neck. RESULTS: As of January 2021, one patient was deceased after 508 days and one patient was lost to follow-up after completing treatment. The median follow-up was 399 days (range 175-756 days) and progression-free survival was 131 days (34-490 days). Acute toxicities at Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 grade 3+ included lowered white blood cell count (16/20), decreased platelet count (8/20), nausea (5/20), vomiting (2/20), pharyngeal mucositis (1/20) and oral mucositis (1/20). Three patients developed grade 4 neutropenia or decreased white blood cell count. CONCLUSIONS: CSI-VMAT can be implemented safely and accurately using robust optimisation functions in a commercially available treatment planning system.

Chronological Analysis of Acute Hematological Outcomes after Proton and Photon Beam Craniospinal Irradiation in Pediatric Brain Tumors.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the early hematological dynamics and acute toxicities between proton beam craniospinal irradiation (PrCSI) and photon beam craniospinal irradiation (PhCSI) for pediatric brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with pediatric brain tumors who received craniospinal irradiation (CSI). The average change in hemoglobin levels (ΔHbavg), absolute lymphocyte counts (ΔALCavg), and platelet counts (ΔPLTavg) from baseline values was evaluated and compared between the PrCSI and PhCSI groups at 1 and 2 weeks after the initiation of CSI, 1 week before and at the end of radiotherapy, and 3-4 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy using t test and mixed-model analysis. RESULTS: The PrCSI and PhCSI groups consisted of 36 and 30 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in ΔHbavg between the two groups at any timepoint. However, ΔALCavg and ΔPLTavg were significantly lower in the PhCSI group than in PrCSI group at every timepoint, demonstrating that PrCSI resulted in a significantly lower rate of decline and better recovery of absolute lymphocyte and platelet counts. The rate of grade 3 acute anemia was significantly lower in the PrCSI group than in in the PhCSI group. CONCLUSION: PrCSI showed a lower rate of decline and better recovery of absolute lymphocyte and platelet counts than PhCSI in the CSI for pediatric brain tumors. Grade 3 acute anemia was significantly less frequent in the PrCSI group than in the PhCSI group. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm these results.

Volumetric de-escalation and improved acute toxicity with proton craniospinal irradiation using a vertebral body-sparing technique.

PURPOSE: In growing children, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) has historically treated the entire vertebral body (VB) to avoid potential long-term spinal abnormalities. Vertebral body-sparing proton craniospinal irradiation (VBSpCSI) is a technique that spares the majority of the VB from significant irradiation, and long-term safety outcomes have been reported previously. This retrospective study reviews the acute toxicity profile of children treated with VBSpCSI in a cohort comparison with photon-based craniospinal radiotherapy (3DCRT). METHODS: Thirty-eight pediatric CSI patients treated between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated for treatment-related toxicity. Acute toxicity outcomes and acute hematologic profiles were compared according to treatment modality, either VBSpCSI or 3DCRT. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test for toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients received VBSpCSI and 13 patients received photon CSI. Mean patient age at treatment was 7.5 years (range 2-16). The cohorts were well matched with respect to gender, age, and CSI dose. Patients receiving VBSpCSI had lower rates of grade 2+ gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (24% vs. 76.5%, p = .005), grade 2+ nausea (24% vs. 61.5%, p = .035), and any-grade esophagitis (0% vs. 38%, p = .0026). Patients treated with VBSpCSI had lower red blood cell transfusion rates (21.7% vs. 60%, p = .049) and grade 4+ lymphopenia (33.3% vs. 77.8%, p = .046). CONCLUSIONS: VBSpCSI in children is a volumetric de-escalation from traditional volumes, which irradiate the entire VB to full or intermediate doses. In our study, VBSpCSI was associated with lower rates of acute GI and hematologic toxicities. Long-term growth outcomes and disease control outcomes are needed for this technique.

Factors Associated With Acute Toxicity in Pediatric Patients Treated With Proton Radiation Therapy: A Report From the Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry.

PURPOSE: Limited prospective information regarding acute toxicity in pediatric patients receiving proton therapy (PT) exists. In this study, Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry (PPCR) data was analyzed for factors associated with development of acute toxicity in children receiving passively scattered or pencil beam scanning PT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pediatric patients treated with PT and enrolled on the PPCR from 2016 to 2017 at 7 institutions were included. Data were entered on presence versus absence of acute general, cardiac, endocrine, eye, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, hematologic, mouth, musculoskeletal, neurologic, psychological, respiratory, and skin toxicities before (baseline) and at the end of PT (acute). Associations between patient and treatment variables with development of acute toxicity were assessed with multivariable modeling. RESULTS: Of 422 patients included, PT technique was passively scattered in 241 (57%), pencil beam scanning in 180 (43%), and missing in 1 (<1%) patient. Median age was 9.9 years. Daily anesthesia for treatment was used in 169 (40%). Treatments were categorized as craniospinal irradiation (CSI; n = 100, 24%), focal central nervous system PT (n = 157, 38%), or body PT (n = 158, 38%). Passively scattered PT was associated with increased risk of hematologic toxicity compared with pencil beam scanning PT (odds ratio [OR]: 3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-6.70; P = .006). There were no other differences toxicities between PT techniques. Uninsured patients had increased risk of GI (OR: 2.71; 95% CI, 1.12-6.58; P = .027) and hematologic toxicity (OR: 10.67; 95% CI, 2.68-42.46; P <.001). Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy were more likely to experience skin (OR: 2.45; 95% CI, 1.23-4.88; P = .011), hematologic (OR: 2.87; 95% CI, 1.31-6.25; P = .008), GI (OR: 2.37; 95% CI, 1.33-4.21; P = .003), and mouth toxicities (OR: 2.03; 95% CI, 1.10-3.73; P = .024). Patients receiving 49 to 55 Gy were more likely to experience skin (OR: 2.18; 95% CI, 1.06-4.44; P = .033) toxicity than those receiving <49 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The PPCR registry highlights broad differences in acute toxicity rates in children receiving PT, and identifies opportunities for improvements in prevention, monitoring, and treatment of toxicities.

Guide for paediatric radiotherapy procedures.

A third of children with cancer receive radiotherapy as part of their initial treatment, which represents 800 paediatric irradiations per year in France carried out in 15 specialized centres approved on the recommendations of the French national cancer institute in decreasing order of frequency, the types of cancer that require irradiation are: brain tumours, neuroblastomas, Ewing's sarcomas, Hodgkin's lymphomas, soft tissue sarcomas including rhabdomyosarcomas, and nephroblastomas. The treatment guidelines follow the recommendations of the French society for childhood cancers (SFCE) or the French and European prospective protocols. The therapeutic indications, the technical and/and ballistic choices of complex cases are frequently discussed during bimonthly paediatric radiotherapy technical web-conferences. All cancers combined, overall survival being 80%, long-term toxicity logically becomes an important concern, making the preparation of treatments complex. The irradiation methods include all the techniques currently available: 3D conformational irradiation, intensity modulation radiation therapy, irradiation under normal or hypofractionated stereotaxic conditions, brachytherapy and proton therapy. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on the indications, the technical methods of realization and the organisation and the specificities of paediatric radiation oncology.

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI) for Children and Adults: A Practical Guide for Implementation.

PURPOSE: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) craniospinal irradiation (CSI) has been shown to have significant dosimetric advantages compared to 3-dimensional conformal therapy but is a technically complex process. We sought to develop a guide for all aspects of the VMAT CSI process and report patient dosimetry results. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We initiated VMAT CSI in 2017 and have regularly revised our standard operating procedure for this process since then. Herein, we report a detailed template for the entire VMAT CSI process from initial patient setup and immobilization at time of computed tomography (CT) simulation to contouring and treatment planning, quality assurance, and therapy delivery. The records of 12 patients who were treated with VMAT CSI were also retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Patient age ranged from 2 to 59 years with 5 pediatric patients (age <18 years), 5 young adults (age 18-35 years), and 2 older adults (age >35 years). The majority of patients (67%) had medulloblastoma. CSI dose ranged from 21.6 to 36 Gy, with a median of 36 Gy. The median CSI planning target volume was 2383 cc with a median V95% of 99.8% and median 0.03 cc hotspot of 112.5%. The average V107% was 7.4% and the average conformality index was 1.01. CONCLUSIONS: VMAT CSI has potentially significant dosimetric and acute toxicity advantages compared to 3-dimensional conformal. However, proper procedures need to be in place throughout the process in order to be able to realize these potential advantages. We herein describe our detailed standard operating procedure for VMAT CSI. Recognizing the scarcity of proton beam centers in many areas, VMAT CSI represents a feasible treatment with more widespread availability.

Variation in Proton Craniospinal Irradiation Practice Patterns in the United States: A Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry (PPCR) Study.

PURPOSE: Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is commonly used for pediatric brain tumors with a propensity for spread in craniospinal fluid, principally medulloblastoma. Evolving technology has led to the use of highly conformal radiation therapy (RT) techniques for CSI, including proton therapy. Target delineation and plan coverage are critical for CSI, but there is ongoing controversy and variability in these realms, with little available data on practice patterns. We sought to characterize proton CSI practice patterns in the United States by examining CSI plans in the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PPCR was queried for data on proton CSI patients from 2015 to early 2020. Each plan was manually reviewed, determining patient position; prescription dose; and coverage of optic nerves, vertebral bodies, spinal nerve roots, sacral nerves, and cranial foramina, among other variables. Two radiation oncologists blinded to clinical data and treating institution assessed coverage at the 95% prescription isodose line and per published European Society for Paediatric Oncology guidelines. Variability in coverage was assessed with nonparametric tests and univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: PPCR supplied data for 450 patients, 384 of whom had an evaluable portion of a CSI plan. Most patients (90.3%) were supine. Optic nerves were fully covered in 48.2%; sacral nerves in 87.7%; cranial foramina in 69.3%; and spinal nerves in 95.6%. Vertebral body (VB) sparing was used in 18.6% of skeletally immature cases, increasing over time (P < .001). Coverage in all categories was significantly different among treating institutions, on univariate and multivariate analyses. Cribriform plate deficits were rare, with marginal misses of the foramen ovale (17.4%) and frontal lobe (12%) most common. CONCLUSION: We found consistent variation based on treating institution in proton CSI practices including optic nerve, VB, sacral nerve, cranial, and spinal nerve coverage. These data may serve as a baseline quantification of current proton CSI practices in the United States as they continue to evolve.

Safety and efficacy of concurrent carboplatin during full-dose craniospinal irradiation for high-risk/metastatic medulloblastoma in a resource-limited setting.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of concurrent carboplatin during craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in high-risk/metastatic medulloblastoma defined as either residual tumor >1.5 cm2 or leptomeningeal metastases. METHODS: This single-arm combined prospective (2005-2011) and retrospective (2011-2019) study was undertaken at a tertiary care cancer center in India. Following surgery, patients with newly diagnosed high-risk/metastatic medulloblastoma received concurrent carboplatin (35 mg/m2 ) for 15 days (day 1 to day 15) during CSI plus posterior fossa/tumor bed boost, followed by six cycles of standard adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: All 97 patients completed their planned course of radiotherapy without interruptions, except for two (2.1%) patients who had brief gaps due to treatment-related toxicity. Grade 3-4 anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia were seen in four (4.1%), 41 (42.2%) 21 (21.6%), and 18 (18.6%) patients, necessitating packed cell transfusion, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and platelet support in five (5.1%), 41 (42.2%), and five (5.1%) patients, respectively, during the concurrent phase. Following myelorecovery, 92 (94.9%) patients completed the planned six cycles of standard adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. There were no treatment-related deaths during the concurrent chemo-radiotherapy phase, while three (3.1%) toxic deaths were ascribed to adjuvant chemotherapy-related complications. At a median follow-up of 82 months, the 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival and overall survival were 60.2% and 62.1%, respectively. On univariate analysis, leptomeningeal metastases (M0/M1 vs. M2/M3) and histological subtype (large cell/anaplastic vs. others) emerged as significant prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSION: Addition of concurrent carboplatin to RT as radiosensitizing chemotherapy is a simple and effective way of treatment intensification in high-risk/metastatic medulloblastoma.

Pretreatment central quality control for craniospinal irradiation in non-metastatic medulloblastoma : First experiences of the German radiotherapy quality control panel in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial.

PURPOSE: Several studies have demonstrated the negative impact of radiotherapy protocol deviations on tumor control in medulloblastoma. In the SIOP PNET5 MB trial, a pretreatment radiotherapy quality control (RT-QC) program was introduced. A first analysis for patients enrolled in Germany, Switzerland and Austria with focus on types of deviations in the initial plan proposals and review criteria for modern radiation technologies was performed. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Sixty-nine craniospinal irradiation (CSI) plans were available for detailed analyses. RT-QC was performed according to protocol definitions on dose uniformity. Because of the lack of definitions for high-precision 3D conformal radiotherapy within the protocol, additional criteria for RT-QC on delineation and coverage of clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) were defined and evaluated. RESULTS: Target volume (CTV/PTV) deviations occurred in 49.3% of initial CSI plan proposals (33.3% minor, 15.9% major). Dose uniformity deviations were less frequent (43.5%). Modification of the RT plan was recommended in 43.5% of CSI plans. Unacceptable RT plans were predominantly related to incorrect target delineation rather than dose uniformity. Unacceptable plans were negatively correlated to the number of enrolled patients per institution with a cutoff of 5 patients (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This prospective pretreatment individual case review study revealed a high rate of deviations and emphasizes the strong need of pretreatment RT-QC in clinical trials for medulloblastoma. Furthermore, the experiences point out the necessity of new RT-QC criteria for high-precision CSI techniques.